<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Illusionists &#187; comedian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/tag/comedian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Funny Ha-Ha or Just Plain Lame? (Vanity UNfair)</title>
		<link>http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/2009/03/vanityunfair/</link>
		<comments>http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/2009/03/vanityunfair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schizophrenic messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tina fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vanity fair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly&#8217;s blog has an interesting post about the latest issue of Vanity Fair.
Judd Apatow&#8217;s funny boys &#8212; Seth Rogen, Jason Segel, and Jonah Hill &#8212; &#8220;recreate&#8221; the sorta-famous Scarlett Johansson/Keira Knightley nude photo shoot for Vanity Fair this month, with Paul Rudd playing the role of the creepily lurking Tom Ford. Except, of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Faseachange.com%2Fblog-illusionists%2F2009%2F03%2Fvanityunfair%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Faseachange.com%2Fblog-illusionists%2F2009%2F03%2Fvanityunfair%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/03/apatow-crew-nak.html" target="_blank">Entertainment Weekly&#8217;s blog</a> has an interesting post about the latest issue of <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com" target="_blank"><em>Vanity Fair</em></a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Judd Apatow&#8217;s funny boys &#8212; Seth Rogen, Jason Segel, and Jonah Hill &#8212; <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/04/comedians-portfolio200904" target="_blank">&#8220;recreate&#8221;</a> the <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2007/02/hollywoodcovers_slideshow200702?slide=12#globalNav" target="_blank">sorta-famous Scarlett Johansson/Keira Knightley nude photo shoot </a>for <em>Vanity Fair</em> this month, with Paul Rudd playing the role of the creepily lurking Tom Ford. Except, of course, they&#8217;re wearing nude body stockings. Because, of course, we wouldn&#8217;t really want to objectify them. It&#8217;s supposed to be funny, see.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-372" title="tomfordcoverandspoof" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tomfordcoverandspoof.jpg" alt="tomfordcoverandspoof" width="504" height="536" /></p>
<p>The post&#8217;s author goes on to discuss the issue of female comedians and the debate on whether or not women can be funny. And the issue that some celebrated female comedians, who have recently become household names and received lots of acclaim (Tina Fey<em> in primis</em>) have actually been featured in Vanity Fair, wearing next to nothing and snapped in overtly sexy poses.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-373 alignnone" title="cuar01_funnygirls0804" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cuar01_funnygirls0804.jpg" alt="cuar01_funnygirls0804" width="493" height="309" /></p>
<p>The post concludes:</p>
<blockquote><p>So that leaves us with this: <strong>Men being objectified is so silly as to be hilarious, but it&#8217;s better if funny women are also hot</strong>. Or maybe it just leaves us to conclude that <em>Vanity Fair</em> has a lot of conflicted feelings to work out in magazine therapy. What do you think? Would you like to see the Apatow crew baring all? Would it be as funny a parody if female comedians did it?</p>
<p>(<em>emphasis mine</em>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the full article <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/03/apatow-crew-nak.html" target="_blank">here</a> – highly recommended.</p>
<p>I had yet to write about the issue of female comedians, so this is the perfect opportunity. Something that terribly saddened me was the recent <em>Vanity Fair</em> issue (yeah, again, same culprit) with Tina Fey on its cover.</p>
<p>What does a hardworking, funny, brilliant &#8211; yet average looking &#8211; woman have to do to be taken seriously, get better and better assignments, and eventually be openly embraced by the mainstream? But of course, she needs a makeover!</p>
<p>Before:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-374" title="35309355" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/35309355.jpg" alt="35309355" width="250" height="450" /></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-378" title="35309352" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/35309352.jpg" alt="35309352" width="250" height="400" /></p>
<p>And then, after the makeover is complete, <strong>she needs to show off her Most Important Assets.</strong></p>
<p>After:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-375" title="tina_fey" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tina_fey.jpg" alt="tina_fey" width="425" height="531" /></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-381" title="D01 v3 Lifeline Fey 01" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/tinafeyvfcover.jpg" alt="D01 v3 Lifeline Fey 01" width="340" height="483" /></p>
<p>Could the Tina Fey of the &#8220;before&#8221; photos ever been featured on the cover of <em>Vanity Fair</em>, just as she was?</p>
<p>Pregnant pause.</p>
<p>Think.</p>
<p>Did it take you more than a nanosecond to come up with the answer &#8220;of course not&#8221;?</p>
<p>Because that is the obvious truth.</p>
<p>Because a female comedian cannot be appreciated just for her brains.</p>
<p>On the other hand, these two beauties (first on the far left and the guy between Seth Rogen and Paul Rudd) got a golden ticket to a <em>Vanity Fair</em> cover:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-382" title="vanityfaircover_l" src="http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/vanityfaircover_l.jpg" alt="vanityfaircover_l" width="240" height="342" /></p>


<!-- Begin TwitThis script (http://twitthis.com/) -->
<div style="text-align:right;">
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.scripts/twitthis.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<a href="javascript:;" onclick="TwitThis.pop();"><img src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.resources/twitthis_grey_72x22.gif" alt="TwitThis" style="border:none;" /></a>');
//-->
</script>
</div>
<!-- /End -->

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aseachange.com/blog-illusionists/2009/03/vanityunfair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

